|
|
 |
|
IMF Concludes 2003 Article
IV Consultation with Bangladesh
Public
Information Notice (PIN) No. 03/84
July 11, 2003
On June 20, 2003, the
Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the
Article IV consultation
with Bangladesh.1
Background
Since the last
Article IV consultation, economic performance has improved and
macroeconomic policy implementation has strengthened, broadly in line
with the recommendations of the Board. The economy has been in a
recovery, led by the agricultural and industrial sectors and aided by
the strength of domestic and external demand. Real GDP growth is thus
projected to accelerate to 5.2 percent for FY03 from the 4.4 percent
growth rate recorded in FY02. At the same time, inflation remains
manageable, although it is on a slight upward trend to around 5¼
percent, owing to rising food prices which were linked to higher utility
tariffs and energy prices.
The external position
has also strengthened over the past year. Following a fall in exports in
FY02, due to a sharp decline in ready-made garments (RMG) prices,
exports have recovered, rising by 6 percent in the ten months through
April 2003. During the same period, remittances continue to be strong,
growing at an annual rate of 24 percent, reflecting in part a further
shift in such flows to official channels. The current account is
projected to remain in a small surplus for FY03. International reserves
have increased to nearly $2 billion as of mid-June, and are projected to
rise further to $2.1 billion by end-June 2003.
Prudent macroeconomic
policies have contributed to these outcomes. In particular, fiscal
policy has been tightened beginning in FY02; revenue was raised by
1 percentage point of GDP, mainly in the nontax area. As a result, the
central government deficit (excluding grants) fell to 4.7 percent of
GDP. At the same time, the monitoring of fiscal developments was
strengthened, especially with respect to Annual Development Plan (ADP)
spending.
Moreover, the deficit
is on course to fall further in FY03 to 4.2 percent of GDP in line with
the budget as a result of significant revenue measures combined with
expenditure discipline. Tax revenue in the first seven months of the
year rose by 16.7 percent, compared to the same period of FY02,
suggesting that tax revenue for the year is on track to improve by
0.6 percentage points of GDP. At the same time, expenditures in the
first seven months fell by 0.8 percentage points of GDP, reflecting
restraint in ADP spending. This result was achieved despite a marked
increase in expenditure to meet reform costs of state-owned enterprises
(SOEs) (0.4 percent of GDP). More recently, the ADP budget has also been
revised downward, to further prune lower priority spending.
Further, the
structure of financing for the deficit in FY03 has improved. Domestic
financing is expected to be cut from 2.5 percent of GDP in FY02 to
1.9 percent. Moreover, based on trends so far, the share of domestic
financing through costly national savings certificates (NSCs) is
expected to fall. To reduce future interest burden, interest rates on
NSCs were reduced by 2 percentage points and the four most costly NSC
schemes were withdrawn in July 2002.
Monetary policy has
been restrained since early 2002, and treasury bill rates have been
allowed to rise, reflecting market conditions. In the year to March
2003, reserve money is estimated to have grown by 6 percent, as
Bangladesh Bank (BB) sterilized its accumulation of international
reserves with auctions of treasury bills. As a result, short-term
treasury bill yields rose from 4 percent to 8 percent over the period;
at the same time, commercial lending rates remained at about 12 percent.
Broad money grew by 15 percent in the year to February 2003, buoyed by
strong growth in credit to the private sector.
Exchange restrictions
have recently been eased, and exchange rate management has been more
flexible, helping to strengthen the external position. In particular,
the scope of the margin requirements on letters of credit for imports
has been reduced, and limits were lifted in August 2002 on travel,
educational and medical expenses, and on payments for other invisibles.
Nonetheless, Bangladesh continues to maintain exchange restrictions
subject to Fund jurisdiction. The exchange rate for the taka remained
fixed to the U.S. dollar from January 2002 until May 31, 2003, when the
taka was allowed to float. With the weakening of the U.S. dollar, during
the period January 2002-May 2003, the taka has depreciated by 12 percent
in nominal effective terms and by an estimated 8 percent in real
effective terms.
The authorities
recently have limited the contracting of new nonconcessional external
debt. During FY03, new loan commitments and guarantees on
nonconcessional terms are projected to be at most $150 million, down
from an estimated $350 million in FY02. External public debt at end-June
2003 is projected at $17 billion (33 percent of GDP). In view of its
concessional nature, debt in NPV terms is about 20 percent of GDP and
101 percent of exports, while the debt service ratio remains relatively
low at 6.5 percent.
Steps have been taken
to renew structural reforms. With respect to manufacturing, the
government has initiated a four-year program to phase out SOEs from this
sector, starting with the closure/privatization of key loss-making
units. In addition to Adamjee jute mills, another 24 out of a total of
150 SOEs have been closed so far in FY03. To ease this process, a
severance scheme has been adopted to provide safety nets for retrenched
workers. In the energy sector, the focus so far has been on tariff and
pricing adjustments, to stem financial losses. Since October 2001,
utility tariffs have been raised by 8 percent, and the prices of a wide
range of energy products have been substantially increased. In addition,
Parliament has recently passed the Energy Regulatory Commission Act,
creating an independent regulator for the sector.
In the banking
sector, the priority has been on improving the legal framework and
upgrading prudential standards. The Bangladesh Bank Order was amended to
provide greater operational autonomy to BB. The Banks (Nationalization)
Act and the Banking Companies Act were also amended to strengthen BB's
regulatory powers by bringing nationalized commercial banks (NCBs)
within its purview and to improve capital adequacy and governance in
private commercial banks. Moreover, a new Money Loans Court law was
enacted that establishes specialist courts to deal with loan defaults
and streamlines the recovery process.
Trade reform was
given renewed impetus in the FY03 budget, when the top customs duty rate
was reduced by 5 percentage points to 32.5 percent, and the number of
rates reduced to five (including a zero rate). The structure of
supplemental duties was also simplified by reducing the number of rates
from 31 to 5. The effective average tariff rate was thus reduced to
24 percent.
Executive Board Assessment
Directors commended
the authorities' prudent macroeconomic management and renewal of
structural reforms, which strengthened economic performance in the past
year. Economic growth is buoyant, inflation remains moderate, and
international reserves have risen. The major challenge facing Bangladesh
now is to put the economy on a higher growth path with faster poverty
reduction. Directors noted that impediments to private sector growth, a
weak banking system, limited public resources, and natural disasters
have held up progress toward achieving this goal.
Directors considered
Bangladesh's National Poverty Reduction Strategy (the I-PRSP), to be a
coherent and comprehensive policy framework for boosting economic growth
and reducing poverty. They emphasized that poverty reduction will
require macroeconomic stability and an improvement in the investment
climate. For this, the authorities will need to accelerate structural
reforms, ease bottlenecks in physical infrastructure, further invest in
human capital, and strengthen governance. Directors encouraged the
authorities to more sharply prioritize pro-poor policies and programs in
framing the full PRSP, to ensure a full costing of these programs within
a medium-term expenditure framework, and to broaden further the
participatory process, particularly to include parliamentarians, to
enhance political support for the reform agenda. Furthermore, monitoring
mechanisms
should be established to gauge the progress
in reducing poverty and, in this context, additional work should be
undertaken to better define final outcome indicators.
Directors endorsed
the macroeconomic framework and the emphasis of the proposed Poverty
Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF)-supported program on fiscal
reforms, restructuring and privatization of the nationalized commercial
banks (NCBs) and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), more liberal exchange
and trade regimes, and improved economic governance. They stressed that
for the structural reforms to be successfully implemented, the
underlying economic governance issues will need to be decisively
tackled. In this context, improved accountability in public resource
management, judicial reform, and the proposed establishment of an
anti-corruption commission would be especially helpful.
On fiscal reform,
Directors welcomed the reduction of the fiscal deficit in fiscal year
2002/03 and the budget framework for fiscal year 2003/04, which is
consistent with a pro-poor growth strategy. Directors noted the low
revenue effort, and underscored the importance of action to boost
revenue, particularly in view of intended trade liberalization. They
endorsed the extension of the coverage of the VAT and income tax and the
strengthening of tax administration. On the expenditure side, Directors
welcomed the planned shift in budget allocations toward financing of
structural reforms, poverty reduction and the social sectors (especially
education), and the critical energy and power sectors. To achieve the
targeted allocation, it will be important to improve development project
selection and implementation, as well as transparency and accountability
in expenditure management, drawing on the recommendations of the fiscal
ROSC.
Directors stressed
that continued fiscal reform over the medium term will be vital, and
should center on a sustained revenue effort and a shift in spending
toward investments in infrastructure and human capital to better support
growth and the Millennium Development Goals. However, while they
welcomed the increased budgetary allocation to education, they stressed
that the effectiveness of social spending is at least as important, and
encouraged the authorities to draw upon the findings and recommendations
of last year's public expenditure review in guiding the projected
increase in spending. To support poverty reduction, it will be important
to promote the development of the rural sector, including through a
better functioning of land markets and through sound microfinance
policies. For public debt sustainability, Directors called on the
authorities to curtail domestic financing for the budget, to exercise
prudence in external debt management, and to refrain from non-concessional
borrowing. Moreover, public debt management should be strengthened,
starting with an improved debt information system.
Directors welcomed
the recent tightening of monetary policy and the greater flexibility in
interest rate policy, which contributed to the successful float of the
exchange rate. They stressed that monetary policy would need to remain
firm in the period ahead in order to contain inflationary pressures,
support orderly conditions in the foreign exchange market, and
facilitate a further rebuilding of international reserves. Over time,
the authorities would need to address some of the recommendations in the
Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) report regarding monetary
policy instruments. The completion of the safeguards assessment of the
central bank was welcomed, and the authorities were urged to address the
critical weaknesses quickly.
Directors endorsed
the authorities' SOE reform plan for the manufacturing sector, noting
the orderly divestment of key loss-making units so far aided by the
safety nets for retrenched workers. They encouraged the authorities to
maintain the momentum of this reform, so as to substantially withdraw
SOEs from this sector within three years as planned and make room for
the private sector.
Directors stressed
that the serious problems of SOEs in the energy sector would also need
to be decisively addressed, in order to contain fiscal risks and ease
critical infrastructure bottlenecks. They welcomed recent pricing
actions, which have helped stem the financial losses of the sector, but
stressed that the effect of price increases on the poor should be
mitigated through a well-targeted social safety net. Directors
encouraged the authorities to make further progress, in consultation
with the World Bank, by moving in a timely way to implement an automatic
pricing framework for energy, starting with adoption in the near term of
an interim pricing formula. An effective regulatory body should also be
installed soon, now that the legal framework is in place. In addition,
Directors attached importance to resolving the inter-enterprise arrears
of SOEs in this sector in the context of an appropriate restructuring,
and to defining the next phase of reforms so as to permit a higher level
of investment in this sector. Plans to improve the pricing and
regulatory framework were considered an important first step, but the
goal should be eventual privatization of the key enterprises. A few
Directors noted the delay in the corporatization of the Telephone and
Telegraph Board, and urged timely implementation of the process.
Directors welcomed
the recent upgrading of the legal framework for banking regulation and
loan recovery, as well as the strengthening of Bangladesh Bank's
operational autonomy and supervision over the NCBs. They considered the
proposed approach to NCB reform to be a cautious but meaningful start to
addressing the weaknesses in this area and in the financial sector more
generally. The planned audits of these banks should help in defining a
resolution strategy for each bank by April 2004, drawing also on the
findings of the FSSA. Some Directors strongly concurred with the
recommendations of the FSSA that all NCBs should be sold off, and
suggested that privatization be included in the resolution strategies.
Directors emphasized the need in the interim to strengthen oversight of
NCBs and bank management, to restrict NCB lending, and to forcefully
address the problems of directed lending and outside interference in the
management of these banks. Directors also called on the authorities to
strengthen anti-money laundering legislation to address terrorism
financing issues and clarify the powers of the financial intelligence
unit, and to upgrade capacity for enforcing the legislation.
Directors welcomed
the recent move to a floating exchange rate regime, which will offer
greater flexibility in macroeconomic policy management, better protect
competitiveness, and enhance Bangladesh's resilience to shocks.
Directors stressed that more will need to be done over the next two
years to rationalize import taxes, reduce the effective rate of
protection, and remove the anti-export bias, especially in order to
diversify exports and reduce external vulnerability.
Noting that the
authorities have proposed timetables for eliminating the restrictions
with respect to the margin requirements for imports and the nonresident
taka accounts, Directors approved these restrictions on a temporary
basis. However, a few Directors were concerned that these timetables had
slipped relative to the previous undertakings. The authorities were
urged to set a timetable for eliminating the remaining restriction on
advance payments for imports.
|
Bangladesh:
Selected Economic Indicators, FY00-04 1/ |
|
|
1999/00 |
2000/01 |
2001/02 |
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proj. |
|
National income
and prices (percent change) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP 2/ |
5.9 |
5.3 |
4.4 |
5.2 |
5.5 |
|
GDP deflator |
1.9 |
1.6 |
2.7 |
4.8 |
4.0 |
|
CPI inflation (annual average) |
3.4 |
1.6 |
2.4 |
5.2 |
4.5 |
|
Central
government operations (percent of GDP) 3/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
8.4 |
9.0 |
10.2 |
10.4 |
11.0 |
|
Tax |
6.7 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
8.3 |
8.9 |
|
Nontax |
1.7 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
|
Total expenditure
|
13.5 |
14.1 |
14.8 |
14.5 |
15.8 |
|
Current expenditure
|
7.5 |
7.7 |
8.0 |
8.4 |
8.5 |
|
Of which: Interest payments |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
Annual Development Program |
5.4 |
6.5 |
5.6 |
5.8 |
6.2 |
|
Extraordinary expenditures |
... |
... |
... |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
Other expenditures 2/ |
0.6 |
-0.2 |
1.2 |
-0.1 |
0.6 |
|
Overall balance (excluding grants) |
-5.1 |
-5.1 |
-4.7 |
-4.2 |
-4.8 |
|
Primary balance |
-3.6 |
-3.5 |
-2.9 |
-2.2 |
-2.8 |
|
Financing (net) |
5.1 |
5.1 |
4.7 |
4.2 |
4.8 |
|
Domestic |
2.7 |
3.1 |
2.6 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
|
External |
2.4 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
|
Total central government debt
(percent of GDP) |
47.9 |
50.8 |
53.2 |
51.7 |
52.2 |
|
Money and credit
(end of year; percent change) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net domestic assets |
13.6 |
20.2 |
11.9 |
10.6 |
11.9 |
|
Private sector |
10.5 |
16.3 |
13.9 |
11.4 |
11.3 |
|
Broad money (M2) |
18.6 |
16.6 |
13.1 |
12.5 |
12.1 |
|
Money velocity |
3.2 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
|
Balance of
payments (US$ millions) 4/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports, f.o.b. |
5,701 |
6,419 |
5,986 |
6,110 |
6,512 |
|
(Annual percent change) |
7.9 |
12.6 |
-6.7 |
2.1 |
6.6 |
|
Imports, f.o.b. |
-7,566 |
-8,430 |
-7,697 |
-8,224 |
-9,600 |
|
(Annual percent change) |
4.8 |
11.4 |
-8.7 |
6.8 |
16.7 |
|
Gross official
reserves (US$ millions) |
1,596 |
1,306 |
1,582 |
2,100 |
2,566 |
|
In months of imports of goods and
nonfactor services |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
|
Memorandum item: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (in billions of taka) |
2,371 |
2,535 |
2,717 |
2,996 |
3,284 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Data provided by
the Bangladesh authorities; and IMF staff estimates and
projections. |
|
1/ Fiscal year begins July 1.
|
|
2/ Consists of other capital, net
lending, and food accounts (including check float and
discrepancy). |
|
3/ Starting FY02, central
government fiscal positions are presented on a gross basis. |
|
4/ Balance of payments is presented
on the basis of BPM5. |
1 Under
Article IV of the
IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions
with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country,
collects economic and financial information, and discusses with
officials the country's economic developments and policies. On
return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the
basis for discussion by the Executive Board. At the conclusion of
the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board,
summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is
transmitted to the country's authorities. |
Source:
http://www.imf.org
|
|
 |
|